|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]连 彦,江巧灵,吴玉香,等.南平三千八百坎景区春季舒适度与空气质量的定量评价[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2017,(02):87-92.
 LIAN Yan,JIANG Qiaoling,WU Yuxiang,et al.A Quantitative Study on the Comfort and Quality of Spring Air in "Sanqian Babai Kan(3800 Steps)" Scenic Spot in Nanping[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2017,(02):87-92.
点击复制

南平三千八百坎景区春季舒适度与空气质量的定量评价(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
87-92
栏目:
地理与资源环境科学
出版日期:
2017-02-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Quantitative Study on the Comfort and Quality of Spring Air in "Sanqian Babai Kan(3800 Steps)" Scenic Spot in Nanping
文章编号:
1672-612x(2017)02-0087-06
作者:
连 彦1江巧灵1吴玉香1莫小云1何天友1郑郁善2*
1.福建农林大学园林学院,福建福州 350002;
2.福建农林大学林学院, 福建福州 350002
Author(s):
LIAN Yan1 JIANG Qiaoling1 WU Yuxiang1 MO Xiaoyun1 HE Tianyou1 ZHENG Yushan2*
1.College of Landscape Architecture,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,Fujian,China;
2.Forestry College, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, Fujian, China
关键词:
南平三千八百坎 舒适度 空气质量
Keywords:
the "Sanqian Babai Kan(3800 Steps)" scenic spot comfort air quality
分类号:
TU986
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以三千八百坎为特定风景区,以春季为特定的时空状态,通过综合测定景区人体舒适度的综合评价指标体系,对南平三千八百坎景区春季舒适度和空气质量状况进行定量分析和评价.沿古道而上选取了9个具有代表性的样地,分别测定空气中的正负离子浓度(个/cm3)、温度(℃)、空气相对湿度(%)、风速(m/s)等反映空气质量、人体舒适度的指标.分析结果表明:①南平三千景区各景点春季舒适度均在Ⅰ级,春季最适宜游憩时间为11:00-14:00时间段,测定样点古木群在一天中舒适度最高.②景区春季的空气负离子含量平均达到3 128/cm3,空气清新度非常好,达到了有益于人体健康的程度,怡心亭的空气负离子含量最高(6 328/cm3),空气负离子浓度由高到底依次为,下午>上午>中午; 瀑布>跌水>水帘; 水边>林中; 半开朗空间>开朗空间.③景区空气质量达到最清洁的水平,森林空气质量等级均在Ⅳ级以上,达到保健功能(Ⅲ级)以上的测定样点有5个.
Abstract:
A quantitative study and assessment of the comfort and quality of the Spring air was conducted in the "Sanqian Babai Kan(3800 Steps)" scenic spot, via a comprehensive evaluation index system of human body. Method: Selecting nine representative sample plots and determine the positive and negative air ion counter(/cm3), temperature(℃), relative air humidity(%)and wind speed(m/s)with Negative Air Ion counter AIC 1000, Humidity Temperature Meter TES-1360A made in Taiwan and PROVE AVM-01 impeller type Anemometer which reflect the index of air quality and comfort. Conclusion: ①The comfort of every sample plot of were all in gradeⅠ.The best travel time was 11:00~14:00 in spring and the Gumuqun was the most comfortable plot in all sample plots in the day. ②The negative air ion content of the scenic spot reached 3128/ cm3 averagely in spring which meaned the air fresh degree was excellent and benefited to human health.The negative air ion content of Yixinting was the highest(6328/cm3).The order from high to low of the negative air ion content was as follows: afternoon > morning > evening; waterfall>drop>nappe; waterside>forest; half-open space>open space. ③The air quality of the scenic spot reached the most clean level and the forest air quality grades were all above grade Ⅳ. Five sample plots were above grade Ⅲ which meaned they reached the degree of health care function.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张莹,马敏劲,王式功,等.中国大陆九大名山风景区旅游气候舒适度评价[J].气象,2013,39(9):1222.
[2] 朱学玲,任健.人体舒适度的分析与预报[J].气象与环境科学,2011(S1):131-134.
[3] 刘梅,于波,姚克敏.人体舒适度研究现状及其开发应用前景[J]. 气象科技,2002(01):11-14+18.
[4] 闫业超,岳书平,刘学华,等.国内外气候舒适度评价研究进展[J].地球科学进展,2013,28(10):1119.
[5] 范业正,郭来喜.中国海滨旅游地气候适宜性评价[J].自然资源学报,1998,13(4):304-311.
[6] 陆林,宣国富,章锦河,等.海滨型与山岳型旅游地客流季节性比较[J].地理学报,2002,57(6):731-740.
[7] 王国新,钱莉莉,陈韬,等.旅游环境舒适度评价及其时空分异:以杭州西湖为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(7):2207-2208.
[8] 王薇,张之秋.城市住区空气负离子浓度时空变化及空气质量评价:以合肥市为例[J].生态环境学报,2014,23(11):1783.
[9] 李少宁,韩淑伟,商天余,等.空气负离子检测与评价的国内外研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(8):3736.
[10] 夏廉博.有益于人体健康的负离子[J].大众医学,1981(7):36-37.
[11] 罗礼洪,孙明,陈云强,等.气象生活指数.四川省质量技术监督局发布(DB 51/T583-2006),2006.
[12] 陆鼎煌. 颐和园夏季小气候 [C]//中国林业学会.中国林业气象文集.北京:气象出版社,1989:221-228.
[13] Starbuck,C.Meghan,Berrens,et al.Simulating changes in forest recreation demand and associated economic impacts due to fire and fuels management activities [J]. Forest Policy and Economics,2006,8(1):52-66.
[14] 王燕玲.基于森林气候疗法理念的福州市金鸡山公园步道规划研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2016:34-35.
[15] 福建日报.福建:“清新指数”生态旅游新卖点[EB/OL].
[2014-04-14].http://www.fjta.gov.cn/ar/20150131014799.htm.
[16] 安倍(卢敬,等译).关于空气离子测定[J].空气清净,1980,7(6):243-248.
[17] 石强,舒惠芳,钟林生,等. 森林游憩区空气负离子评价研究[J].林业科学,2004(01):36-40.
[18] 关蓓蓓,郑思俊,崔心红.城市人工林空气负离子变化特征及其主要影响因子[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016(01):73-79.
[19] 周德平,佟维华,温日红,等.闾山国家级森林公园负氧离子观测及其空气质量分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015(03):181-187.

相似文献/References:

[1]李 新,郑莉萍,单倩倩,等.蜀南竹海旅游环境舒适度评价及其影响因子分析[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2019,(11):92.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.11.018]
 LI Xin,ZHENG Liping,SHAN Qianqian,et al.Evaluation of Tourism Environmental Comfort Level and the Influencing Factors of Southern Sichuan Bamboo Sea[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2019,(02):92.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.11.018]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
第一作者简介:连彦(1992— ),女,福建龙岩人, 硕士研究生,研究方向: 风景园林规划设计与理论.
*通信作者:郑郁善(1960— ),男,福建闽清人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:园林植物应用与园林规划设计及森林培育学研究.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-15