|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]高 恒.严羽对《诗经》的态度新探——以《沧浪诗话》和严羽的创作实践为考察中心[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2017,(06):108-116.
 GAO Heng.A New Study on Yan Yu's Attitude towards The Book of Songs: Taking Poem Theory of Canglang and Yan Yu's Poetry Creation for Example.[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2017,(06):108-116.
点击复制

严羽对《诗经》的态度新探——以《沧浪诗话》和严羽的创作实践为考察中心(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2017年06期
页码:
108-116
栏目:
文艺学
出版日期:
2017-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
A New Study on Yan Yu's Attitude towards The Book of Songs: Taking Poem Theory of Canglang and Yan Yu's Poetry Creation for Example.
文章编号:
1672-612X(2017)06-0108-09
作者:
高 恒
四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都 610000
Author(s):
GAO Heng
Institute of Popular Culture, School of literature and journalism, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610000
关键词:
《诗经》 《沧浪诗话》 严羽 经学 创作实践
Keywords:
The Book of Songs Poem Theory of Canglang Yan Yu Confucian classics creative practice
分类号:
I206.2
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
严羽的《沧浪诗话》在有宋一代诗话中堪称中流砥柱,对元、明、清的诗学理论和创作实践都产生了巨大影响。《沧浪诗话》所具有的一系列几近成熟的理论体系和独到的诗学理论,使得严羽《沧浪诗话》的研究一直是人们关注重点,如其中的“妙悟”说、“别材别趣”说,以及提倡师法盛唐的诗学主张都是后人理论研究的焦点。但《沧浪诗话》中一个最基础的问题,理论界却一直没有达成共识,那就是关于《沧浪诗话》中《诗经》的遮蔽问题。从传统诗学的角度来讲,《诗经》作为经学化的诗学源头是必不可少的,但是严羽在《沧浪诗话》中却一再削弱《诗经》的权重、
Abstract:
Yan Yu's Poem Theory of Canglang, which can be viewed as a milestone in poetry works in the Song Dynasty poetry, has a significant impact on poetry practice and theoryin the subsequentYuan, Ming and Qing Dynasties. With a series ofalmost mature theoretical systemand unique poetry theories, Poem Theory of Canglang has always been the focus of academic research, especially on his " Miao Wu"" Biecai Biequ" and his advocating learning from the poetry of the Tang Dynasty.Among its research, one fundamental question hasn't reach an agreement in academy: why did Yan Yu weaken or ignore intentionallythe role of The Book of Songs, which is regarded as the origin and classicin poetry creation? This paper attempts to approach this question from Yan Yu's poetry theory and poetry creation experience and concludes that Yan show his respect to this poetry classic: in his poetry theory in an implicit way, and in his poetry creation in an explicit way by following the writing originated from The Book of Songs.

参考文献/References:

[1] 张少康.中国文学理论批评史(上)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
[2] 许志刚.严羽评传[M].南京:南京大学出版社,1997.
[3] 黄培青.宋元时期严羽诗论接受史研究(上)[M].台湾:花木兰文化出版社,2009.
[4] 刘克庄.后村诗话[M].北京:中华书局出版,1983.
[5] 南怀瑾.南怀瑾选集:楞严大义今释[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2013.
[6] 圆悟克.碧岩录[M].郑州:中州出版社,2015.
[7] 陈应鸾.岁寒堂诗话校笺[M].成都:巴蜀书社,2000.
[8] 郭绍虞.沧浪诗话校释[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1961.
[9] 曹东.严羽研究[M].北京:军事谊文出版社,2002.
[10] 宇文所安.中国文论:英译与评论[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2002.
[11] 陈伯海.陈伯海文集[M].上海:上海社会科学院出版社,2015.
[12] 李锐清.沧浪诗话的诗歌理论研究[M].香港:香港中文大学出版社,1992.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
作者简介:高恒(1991— ),男,山东枣庄人,硕士研究生,研究方向:宋元文学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-06-15