|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]林荔敏.“第三空间”下《阿尔迈耶的愚蠢》中阿尔迈耶夫妇的文化定位[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2017,(12):111-116.
 LIN Limin.The Cultural Location of Almayer and Mrs. Almayer in Almayer' s Follyunder "The Third Space"[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2017,(12):111-116.
点击复制

“第三空间”下《阿尔迈耶的愚蠢》中阿尔迈耶夫妇的文化定位(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2017年12期
页码:
111-116
栏目:
外国文学
出版日期:
2017-12-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Cultural Location of Almayer and Mrs. Almayer in Almayer' s Follyunder "The Third Space"
文章编号:
1672-612X(2017)12-0111-06
作者:
林荔敏
四川大学外国语学院,四川成都 610065
Author(s):
LIN Limin
College of Foreign Languages, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065
关键词:
文化定位 “第三空间” 模拟 文化重新编码 文化离散状态
Keywords:
cultural identity "the third space" mimicry cultural recoding unhomeliness
分类号:
I106.4
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
处于多元文化和多民族混合的“第三空间”下,阿尔迈耶固守本质性的白人身份,拒绝融入马来社会,但实际上其为白人社会所抛弃,沦为文化无根者,最终文化定位失败,人生以自杀收尾。相反,土著人阿尔迈耶太太诉诸“模拟”和“文化重新编码”策略,且其反抗活动几乎同时在私人空间和公共空间进行,达到灵活抵抗白人文化的目的。其对白人文化和土著文化的杂糅和灵活利用,最终使她文化定位成功并得以生存。二者不同的文化定位策略,导致了不同的个人命运和文化归宿。基于霍米·巴巴的后殖民理论,分析二者文化身份定位问题,为后殖民语境中的殖民者和被殖民者,主流群体和边缘化群体如何正确地反思其在“第三空间”中的文化身份定位提供思考的空间。
Abstract:
Under the multiple-culture and multi-ethnic context, Almayer keeps to his endogenous white identity and refuses to fit into the Malayan society, but actually he is abandoned by the white society and becomes a culturally-rootless person, thus failing in cultural location and finally ending his life by suicide. Instead, Mrs. Almayer resorts to the mimicry and cultural recoding strategies and moreover her resistance activities have transcended the traditional division of the public and private space and intruded into every detail of her lives. Her flexible blending and use of the while and Malayan culture makes her succeed in cultural location and in living. Their different strategies of cultural location result in different personal fates and endings. Based on the postcolonial theory of Homi Bhabha, the present paper is going to interpret them and their cultural location problems, trying to provide the space for thinking about the cultural location in "the third space" or in modern globalized environment for the colonizer and the colonized, and the main-stream groups and the marginalized ones.

参考文献/References:

[1] MOORE G M.Slavery and Racism in Joseph Conrad' s Eastern World[J].Journal of Modern Literature,2007,30(4):20—38.
[2] RAJA M A.Joseph Conrad:The Question of Racism and Representation of Muslims in his Malayan Works[J].Unt Scholarly Works,2008,3(4).
[3] SEWLALL H.The Postcolonial Space in Joseph Conrad:A Consideration of Two Early Novels[J].Journal of Literary Studies,2003,19(1).
[4] BHABHA H K.The Location of Culture[M].London:Routledge,2004.
[5] CONRAD J.Almayer' s Folly[M].New York:The Country Life Press,1924.
[6] 董洪川,龙丹.经典与帝国:萨义德的经典观[J].外国文学研究,2008,30(4):159.
[7] 陶家俊.身份认同导论[J]. 外国文学,2004(2):41.
[8] LIM S.Uk.The Myth of Origin in Dialogism and Hybridity[J].Journal for the Study of Religious and Ideologies,2011,10(29):20.
[9] SAID E.Covering Islam[M].New York:Vintage,1997.
[10] LOOMBA A.Colonialism/Postcolonialism[M].Second Edition.New York:Routledge,2005.
[11] ROFF W R.The Origins of Malay Nationalism[M].New Haven:Yale University Press,1967.
[12] 翟晶.边缘世界:霍米·巴巴后殖民理论研究[D].北京:中央美术学院,2008.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-06-22
作者简介:林荔敏(1992— ),女,福建莆田人,硕士研究生,研究方向:现当代西方文论、英美文学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-12-15