|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]曹 芮,杨 红*,钟 磊,等.基于模糊模式识别的人工湿地水质净化效果评价——以西昌缺缺河人工湿地为例[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2018,(11):116-123.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2018.11.022]
 CAO Rui,YANG Hong*,ZHONG Lei,et al.Effect Evaluation on the Water Quality Purification of Constructed Wetland Based on Fuzzy Pattern Recognition Theory——A case of Xichang Quequehe Constructed Wetland[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2018,(11):116-123.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2018.11.022]
点击复制

基于模糊模式识别的人工湿地水质净化效果评价——以西昌缺缺河人工湿地为例(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2018年11期
页码:
116-123
栏目:
地理与资源环境科学
出版日期:
2018-11-07

文章信息/Info

Title:
Effect Evaluation on the Water Quality Purification of Constructed Wetland Based on Fuzzy Pattern Recognition Theory——A case of Xichang Quequehe Constructed Wetland
文章编号:
1672-612X(2018)11-0116-08
作者:
曹 芮杨 红*钟 磊向红艳费艳旭
西昌学院资源与环境学院,四川西昌 615013
Author(s):
CAO Rui YANG Hong*ZHONG LeiXIANG HongyanFEI Yanxu
School of Resource and Environment, Xichang University, Xichang, Sichuan 615013
关键词:
模糊模式识别理论 人工湿地 水质级别 水质净化
Keywords:
fuzzy pattern recognition theoryconstructed wetland water quality water quality purification
分类号:
X522
DOI:
10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2018.11.022
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
基于模糊模式识别理论的5级和6级水质评价模型,以邛海湿地中缺缺河人工湿地为例,分别对丰水期、平水期和枯水期人工湿地进口、出口的水质进行评价,计算不同时期缺缺河人工湿地对水污染物的净化效果; 并比较分析运用5级和6级模型进行水质评价其水质级别和净化效果的差异.结果表明:采用5级模型评价时的水质优于采用6级模型评价的结果,而6级水质评价模型分析结果与实际情况相符性更高.6级模型中,依据水质级别发现,该人工湿地仅在平水期具有一定的净化效果,丰水期和枯水期均无效果; 而采用级别特征值法进行分析,平水期、枯水期具有一定净化效果,丰水期不但无净化效果,反倒有一定程度的恶化,表明该人工湿地内源污染对水质的整体情况产生了不利影响.
Abstract:
In order to study the water quality purification effect of Quequehe constructed wetland that located in the wetland surrounding Qionghai Lake, comprehensive water quality assessment model with 5-level evaluation and 6-level evaluation of water quality were performed in the study based on fuzzy pattern recognition theory. The water quality of inlet and outlet and the water quality purification effect of the Quequehe constructed wetland in wet season, normal water period and dry season were evaluated. At the same time, comparison of the differences of the evaluation results between by making 5-level evaluation and 6-level evaluation was conducted. The result shows that the water quality of 5-level evaluation is better than that of 6-level evaluation, while the result of 6-level evaluation is more close to the actual situation of water quality. According to the comprehensive water quality levels evaluated by the 6-level evaluation, there was no purification effects during the wet and dry season but the normal water period. However, according to the grade feature values evaluated by the 6-level evaluation, the water quality got better during the normal water period, but worse during the wet and dry season, which could conduct that internal pollution sources took adverse effect to the water quality of the Quequehe constructed wetland.

参考文献/References:

[1] 董哲仁.河流健康的内涵[J].中国水利,2005(4):15-18.
[2] 周林飞,许士国,孙万光.基于灰色聚类法的扎龙湿地水环境质量综合评价[J].大连理工大学学报,2007(2):240-245.
[3] 于福荣,杨育红,卢文喜.物元可拓法在金泉工业园区地下水质量评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(6):38-40.
[4] 汪天祥,许士国,韩成伟.改进主成分分析法在南淝河水质评价中的应用[J].水电能源科学,2012,30(10):33-36.
[5] 崔嘉宇,张宁红,郁建桥,等.改进的模糊评价法在太湖水质评价中的应用[J].环境工程学报,2015,9(11):5357-5363.
[6] ZOU Z H,YUN Y,SUN J N.Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2006(5):1020-1023.
[7] 易睿,丁志成.应用模糊数学法评价扬州市内城河水质研究[J].环境科学与管理,2014,39(3):182-184.
[8] 周林飞,高云彪,许士国.模糊数学在湿地水质评价中应用的研究[J].水利水电技术,2005(1):35-38.
[9] LI R R,ZOU Z H,AN Y.Water quality assessment in Qu River based on fuzzy water pollution index method[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2016,50(12):87-92.
[10] WANG X J,ZOU Z H,ZOU H.Water quality evaluation of Haihe River with fuzzy similarity measure methods[J].Journal of Environmental Sciences,2013,25(10):2041-2046.
[11] 王月敏,孙秀玲,曹升乐,等.基于模糊模式识别理论的水质综合评价的改进[J].人民黄河,2015,37(11):62-65+69.
[12] 周向华,杨侃,蒋立伟,等.引入SPA的6级模糊模式识别模型在水质综合评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2016,27(6):1-6.
[13] 周林飞,张明含,王鹤翔,等.石佛寺人工湿地对辽河水质净化效果的影响[J].水电能源科学,2016,34(6):32-35+52.
[14] 黄珍.人工湿地污水处理系统在城市污水处理中的应用[J].甘肃农业,2012(8):39-40.
[15] 高廷耀,顾国维,周琪.水污染控制工程(下册)[M].4版.北京:高等教育出版社,2015.
[16] 高欣冉,李慧民.人工湿地农村污水处理技术适用性的模糊评价[J].资源节约与环保,2015(4):158.
[17] 李洪利.基于模糊综合评判的石佛寺人工湿地水质评价[J].水土保持应用技术,2014(3):6-8.
[18] 谢志强,张豪,杨静.基于混合属性的多级模糊模式识别在水质评价中的应用[J].水资源与水工程学报,2008(2):1-3+15.
[19] 徐力刚,叶昌,张奇,等.基于模糊模式识别的地下水水质综合评价研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2011,38(5):7-12.
[20] 陈守煜.工程模糊集理论与应用[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1998.
[21] 陈奕,许有鹏.河流水质评价中模糊数学评价法的应用与比较[J].四川环境,2009,28(1):94-98.
[22] 马玉杰,郑西来,李永霞,等.地下水质量模糊综合评判法的改进与应用[J].中国矿业大学学报,2009,38(5):745-750.
[23] 徐健,吴玮,黄天寅,等.改进的模糊综合评价法在同里古镇水质评价中的应用[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(2):143-149.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2018-06-04
基金项目:四川省科技支撑计划项目“四川省可持续发展实验区水污染防治技术研发与示范”(15ZC0648); 四川省教育厅项目“邛海入湖河流底泥氮、磷及有机质分布规律及释放趋势研究”(16ZB0258).
第一作者简介:曹芮(1985- ),女,四川江油人,助教,硕士,研究方向:高原湖泊湿地保护、土壤污染修复、农业废弃物资源化.
*通信作者简介:杨红(1968- ),女,四川会东县人,教授,硕士,研究方向:高原湖泊保护.
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-11-07