|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张 路.云南石林盆地景观视觉环境质量评价[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2019,(11):111-119.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.11.021]
 ZHANG Lu.The Visual Environment Quality Evaluation oLandscape in Yunnan[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2019,(11):111-119.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.11.021]
点击复制

云南石林盆地景观视觉环境质量评价(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2019年11期
页码:
111-119
栏目:
地理与资源环境科学
出版日期:
2019-11-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Visual Environment Quality Evaluation oLandscape in Yunnan
文章编号:
1672-612X(2019)11-0111-09
作者:
张 路
云南师范大学旅游与地理科学学院,云南昆明 650500
Author(s):
ZHANG Lu
School of Tourism and Geographical Science, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming,Yunnan 650500
关键词:
石林盆地 视觉环境质量 景观评价
Keywords:
Shilin basin visual environment quality landscape evaluation
分类号:
X820.2; B83-05
DOI:
10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.11.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
景观视觉环境质量是城市环境和资源价值评价的重要内容.本文在云南石林盆地的遥感卫星地图基础上,以景观敏感度的相对视距、坡度、可视域和醒目程度4个因素进行权重叠加,确定出石林盆地的7个景观敏感区.结合景观生态学与景观美学相关理念价值,构建了景观视觉环境质量评价体系,评价了石林盆地内景观视觉环境质量的空间特征,识别了景观视觉资源保护的关键区.研究结果表明:石林盆地的清水塘一带为景观视觉资源保护关键区,应严格禁止破坏其景色质量的建设活动的进行; 大可镇、习克丈村和小波溪村区相对于小河村的景观质量较低,适合在此区域进行新的城镇建设活动.研究可为石林盆地景观资源的有效保护和利用提供科学依据,同时拓宽景观保护区识别与区划方法的研究思路.
Abstract:
The visual quality of landscape is the important content both of urban environment and resource value evaluation.On the basis of remote sensing satellite map of Shilin basin, this paper determines seven landscape sensitive areas of Shilin basin by overlapping four factors of landscape sensitivity: relative visual distance, slope, visual field and eye-catching degree.Combined with the value of landscape ecology and landscape aesthetics, the evaluation system of landscape visual environment quality is constructed, the spatial characteristics of landscape visual environment quality in Shilin basin is evaluated, and the key areas of landscape visual resources protection is identified.The results showed that the area of Qing Shui Tang is a key area for landscape visual resources Conservation, in which the construction activities that damaged the quality of the landscape should be strictly forbidden.The low visual quality areas including Da Ke town, Xi Ke Zhang and Xiao Bo Xi village were suitable for the construction activities of new towns.From the study, scientific basis for the effective protection and utilization of landscape resource in the Shilin basin was provide, and even the research mind of distinguishing and zoning method for protected area of landscape resources was broadened.

参考文献/References:

[1] 姚玉敏,徐迎碧.景观视觉环境质量评价研究进展[J].园艺与种苗, 2013(7):11-13.
[2] 王晓俊.美国风景资源管理系统及其方法[J].自然资源学报, 1993(4):371-380.
[3] 裘亦书.基于GIS技术的景观视觉质量评价研究[D].上海:上海师范大学, 2013.
[4] Daniel T C, Boster R S.The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method[M].New York: Plenum Press, 1976.
[5] Buhyoff G J, Leuschner W A, Arndt L K.Replication of a scenic preference function[J].Forest Science, 1980,26(2):227-230.
[6] Gobster P H.An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management[J].landscape Journal, 1999,18(1):54-64.
[7] Val G D L F D, José A.Atauri, José V.de Lucio.Relationship between landscape visual attributes and spatial pattern indices: A test study in Mediterranean-climate landscapes[J].Landscape & Urban Planning, 2006,77(4):393-407.
[8] PALMER J F.Using spatial metrics to predict scenic perception in a changing landscape: Dennis, Massachusetts[J].Landscape & Urban Planning, 2004,69(2):201-218.
[9] 角媛梅,杨有洁,胡文英,等.哈尼梯田景观空间格局与美学特征分析[J].地理研究, 2006(4):624-632.
[10] 周年兴,黄震方,蒋铭萍,等.庐山森林景观美学质量与景观格局指数的关系[J].地理研究, 2012,31(7):1224-1232.
[11] 孙漪南,赵芯,王宇泓,等.基于VR全景图技术的乡村景观视觉评价偏好研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2016,38(12):104-112.
[12] 张慧,沈渭寿,江腊沙,等.青藏铁路沿线景观保护评价方法研究[J].生态学报, 2004(3):574-582.
[13] 刘红战,张小凌,姚明波.云南石林盆地地热地质特征及成因分析[J].东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,37(1):69-74.
[14] 俞孔坚.景观敏感度与阀值评价研究[J].地理研究, 1991(2):38-51.
[15] 刘惠明,杨燕琼,罗富和.基于3S技术的景观敏感度测定研究[J].华南农业大学学报, 2003(3):78-81.
[16] 周根苗,薛亮,冯超,等.风景林景观美学评价指标体系的探讨[J].林业资源管理, 2008(5):69-74.
[17] 王保忠,王保明,何平.景观资源美学评价的理论与方法[J].应用生态学报, 2006(9): 1733-1739.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-06-22 作者简介:张路(1989-),男,云南玉溪人,硕士研究生,研究方向:人文地理.
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-20