|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]彭沈莉.南朝三教合流与自然“比德”说之多重意蕴[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2018,(06):110-114.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2018.06.019]
 PENG Shenli.The Confluence of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism in the Southern Dynasties and the Multiple Meanings of "Nature Bi-De"[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2018,(06):110-114.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2018.06.019]
点击复制

南朝三教合流与自然“比德”说之多重意蕴(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2018年06期
页码:
110-114
栏目:
古代文学
出版日期:
2018-06-15

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Confluence of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism in the Southern Dynasties and the Multiple Meanings of "Nature Bi-De"
文章编号:
1672-612X(2018)06-0110-05
作者:
彭沈莉
绵阳师范学院,四川绵阳 621000
Author(s):
PENG Shenli
Mianyang Teacher' s College, Mianyang, Sichuan 621000
关键词:
南朝 三教合流 比德 自然审美
Keywords:
Southern dynasties the confluence of Confucianism Taoism and Buddhism "nature Bi-De" aesthetics
分类号:
I206.2
DOI:
10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2018.06.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
中国古代自然审美观至魏晋南北朝为关键性的一变,开启了自然审美的自觉阶段,此为学界共识。那么,关注自然物本身的形貌之美带来的精神愉悦是否能概括这个阶段的自然审美观?笔者认为,至少在文人审美意识中,儒学“比德”仍然处于重要地位。同时,“比德”的思维在文学实践中,又发生了与儒学思想的游离。本文试图将这一细微的变化与当时的文化背景联系起来探讨,以见文人自然审美观念多元交织的面貌。
Abstract:
The natural aesthetic view of ancient China to the key change of the Wei, Jin and Northern and Southern Dynasties opened the conscious stage of natural aesthetic, which is the common understanding of the academic community. So, can the spiritual pleasure of the beauty of the nature of the nature itself be concerned with the natural beauty of this stage? I think, at least in the literati aesthetic consciousness of Confucianism, "Nature Bi-De" is still in an important position. At the same time, "Nature Bi-De" in the literary practice drifted away from Confucianism. This article tries to connect this subtle change with the cultural background of the time, in order to see the multi intertwined features of the literati's natural aesthetic ideas.

参考文献/References:

[1] 沈约.宋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[2] 姚思廉.梁书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[3] 李百药.北齐书[M].北京:中华书局,1972.
[4] 严可均.全上古三代秦汉三国六朝文[M].北京:中华书局,1958.
[5] 释道宣.广弘明集[M].上海:上海书店,1989.
[6] 王利器.颜氏家训集解[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1980.
[7] 朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[8] 许维遹.韩诗外传集释[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[9] 欧阳询.艺文类聚[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.
[10] 逯钦立.先秦汉魏晋南北朝诗[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[11] 曹融南.谢宣城集校注[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1991.
[12] 彭铎.潜夫论笺校正[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[13] 阮元.十三经注疏[M].北京:中华书局,1980.
[14] 萧子显.南齐书[M].北京:中华书局,1972.
[15] 姚思廉.梁书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[16] 刘毓庆.《诗》学之“兴”的还原与背离[J].文学评论,2008(4):20-28.
[18] 萧统.文选[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1986.

相似文献/References:

[1]邹建雄.论南朝刘宋帝室的文学风格[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2015,(07):92.
 ZOU Jianxiong.Literary Style of Imperial Family in Southern Dynasty[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2015,(06):92.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-10-12
基金项目:国家社科基金重大招标项目“先秦汉魏晋南北朝隋诗学文献集成校笺”(14ZDB064)。
作者简介:彭沈莉(1980- ),女,四川彭山人,副教授,博士,研究方向:文艺美学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-06-15