|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王 静.人格物在民法上的保护探析[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2019,(07):26-29+40.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.07.006]
 WANG Jing.Research on the Protection of Property for Personhood in Civil Law[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2019,(07):26-29+40.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.07.006]
点击复制

人格物在民法上的保护探析(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2019年07期
页码:
26-29+40
栏目:
法律研究
出版日期:
2019-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research on the Protection of Property for Personhood in Civil Law
文章编号:
1672-612X(2019)07-0026-04
作者:
王 静
淮北师范大学政法学院,安徽淮北 235000
Author(s):
WANG Jing
College of Political Science and Law, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, Anhui 235000
关键词:
人格物 人格利益 一般人格权 善意取得
Keywords:
property for personhood personality interests general personality right acquisition in good faith
分类号:
D923
DOI:
10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.07.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为应对新时代背景下财产权和人格权不断交融的趋势,对民法中传统的人的主体性和物的客体性二元论进行延伸探究,以更好地保护蕴含人格利益的物。首先阐释了人格物的内涵,并在此基础上分析了人格物保护的必要性。人格物保护的必要性表现在司法实务的需求和一般人格权保护的延伸。最后从实体法方面,诸如人格物的现有法律保护、人格物的归属与处分,以及人格物是否适用善意取得等方面探究人格物的保护,以便更好地维护人格物权利人的合法权益。
Abstract:
In order to cope with the integration trend of property right and personality right under the background of the new era, the traditional dualism of human subjectivity and object in the civil law is extended to explore, so as to better protect the objects containing personality interests. Firstly, the connotation of property for personhood is explained, and on this basis, the necessity of protecting property for personhood is analyzed, which is reflected in the requirements of judicial practice and the extension of general personality right protection. Finally, from the aspect of substantial law, such as the existing legal protection of property for personhood, the attribution and disposition of property for personhood, and whether property for personhood is applicable to the acquisition in good faith and other aspects to explore the protection of property for personhood, so as to better safeguard obligee's legitimate rights and interests of property for personhood.

参考文献/References:

[1] 冷传莉.论人格物的界定及动态发展[J].法学论坛,2010,25(2):61-66.
[2] 徐国栋.现代的新财产分类及其启示[J].广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,27(6):49-53.
[3] 冷传莉.民法上人格物的确立及其保护[J].法学,2007(2):74-80.
[4] 博登海默.法理学法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[5] 梁慧星.民法总论[M].北京:法律出版社,2011.
[6] 王利明.民法总则研究[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.
[7] 冷传莉.人格物确立的法理透视[J].政法论坛,2010,28(6):67-74.
[8] 杨立新.论侵害财产权中的精神损害赔偿[J].人民检察,2002(6):15.
[9] 尹田.论一般人格权[J].法律科学,2002(4):11-18.
[10] 佟柔.中国民法[M].北京:法律出版社,1990.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-01-16
作者简介:王静(1996- ),女,安徽淮南人,硕士研究生,研究方向:民法学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-20