|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]阙诗涛.无产者迷思:奥威尔的阶级局限性解析[J].绵阳师范学院学报,2019,(07):100-105.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.07.020]
 QUE Shitao.The Myth of the Proles: An Analysis of the Limitations of Orwell's Class Consciousness[J].Journal of Mianyang Normal University,2019,(07):100-105.[doi:10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.07.020]
点击复制

无产者迷思:奥威尔的阶级局限性解析(PDF)
分享到:

《绵阳师范学院学报》[ISSN:1672-612X/CN:51-1670/G]

卷:
期数:
2019年07期
页码:
100-105
栏目:
外国文学
出版日期:
2019-07-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Myth of the Proles: An Analysis of the Limitations of Orwell's Class Consciousness
文章编号:
1672-612X(2019)07-0100-06
作者:
阙诗涛
闽江学院外国语学院,福建福州 350108
Author(s):
QUE Shitao
College of Foreign Languages, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350108
关键词:
奥威尔 无产者 迷思 阶级意识 局限性
Keywords:
Orwell the proles myth class consciousness limitations
分类号:
I106.3
DOI:
10.16276/j.cnki.cn51-1670/g.2019.07.020
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
身为一名以政治写作见长的作家,乔治·奥威尔在写作生涯中持续关注无产者这一群体,并将其作为文学作品中的重要元素。奥威尔试图深入了解无产者,并理清他们与自己的关系。在此过程中,他对无产者的认知经历了由积极到消极的转变。通过对比奥威尔在作品中对无产者刻画的前后差异,结合他与无产者交流的实际体验,并从他特殊的中产阶级出身出发,能够分析得出:由于自身阶级局限,奥威尔尝试打破阶级疆界与无产者建立纽带的努力注定以失败告终。而他在作品中对无产者迷思的构建则是这一努力失败在文学层面上的反映。
Abstract:
As a writer famous for political writing, George Orwell has kept up an interest in the proles throughout his writing career, making them one of the major elements in his literary works. Orwell made great efforts to understand the proles and his relationship with them. During the process, his attitude towards the proles turned from positive to negative. This paper compares the differences in Orwell's portrayal of the proles in his works, relates to his experiences with them, and analyzes the problem from the perspective of Orwell's unique class identity. Thus, it concludes that due to the limitations of his class consciousness, Orwell was doomed to failure when he tried to break the class boundary and bond with the proles. The construction of the myth of the proles in his works is a literary reflection of the failure.

参考文献/References:

[1] 乔治·奥威尔.通往威根码头之路[M].伽禾,译.北京:人民文学出版社,2017.
[2] 王小梅.从《通往维根码头之路》看奥威尔的政治观[J].外国文学,2004(1):91-95.
[3] 高杨.一个马克思主义文论家的立场:以雷蒙·威廉斯对奥威尔的研究为例[J].外国文学动态研究,2018(3):5-12.
[4] 乔治·奥威尔.一九八四[M].董乐山,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006.
[5] ZEHR D M.Orwell and the Proles: Revolutionary or Middle-Class Voyeur?[J].The Centennial Review, 1983, 27(1):30-40.
[6] 郭台辉.无产者从何而来,向何处去:马克思到西塞罗的历史倒溯[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2018(5):12-25+1.
[7] 乔治·奥威尔.巴黎伦敦落魄记[M]. 陈超,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2017.
[8] HUNTER J.Orwell's Prose: Discovery, Communion, Separation [J].The Sewanee Review, 1979, 87(3):436-454.
[9] BEADLE G B.George Orwell's Literary Studies of Poverty in England[J].Twentieth Century Literature, 1978, 24(2):188-201.
[10] PEARCE R.Revisiting Orwell's Wigan Pier [J].History, 1997, 82(267):410-428.
[11] 陈晓律.资本主义的历史发展与大罢工的使命:1926年英国大罢工失败的启示[J].当代世界与社会主义,1997(2):40-44.
[12] GRAFF G.George Orwell and the Class Racket[J].Salmagundi,1986(70/71):108-120.
[13] DAVISON P, ed. Orwell's England [M]. London: Penguin Books, 2001.
[14] NEWSINGER J. Hope Lies in the Proles[M].London: Pluto Press, 2018.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2019-04-28
作者简介:阙诗涛(1984- ),男,福建福州人,讲师,硕士,研究方向:英美文学。
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-07-20